Robert McTaggart wrote:
Glad you've lost your cherry, Dina. Please tell me more about 'telepathic sex'.
well, i want to start by thanking you for your response (nevermind the cherries. i prefer "morello"). i received only one more and that was on my private line. you think you're doing people a service, but alas... "telepathic sex" was perhaps not the most appropriate way of describing this. [to bring the topic around to the mailing list, it is certainly a technique that could be employed by the more imaginative when the dating serice a la cilla is initiated]. i will henceforth refer to the phenomenom as "hands-off non-phone sex". yes, that has a certain ring to it. the scenario : two people are standing next to each other, though not touching. they are both staring straight ahead, hands by their sides, and speaking to each other. x : i'm touching you. can you feel me? y : yes. i can feel you. x : my hands are on your chest. is it warming? y : yes, warming... x : i'm heading south. y : yes, i love the south. and so on and so on until it gets fairly steamy and such. there you go - "hands-off non-phone sex". please, everyone, try this technique and report back. anyway, what's this "lord-love-a-duck" business? you know we're all avid atheist vegetarians! shame on you, tag! as per mr. dan tracey, this is rather old news and no one is going to save a grown man from himself. duckless lordless loveless > dina ----------------------------------------------------------------------- . This message was brought to you by the Sinister mailing list. . To send to the list please mail "sinister@majordomo.net". . For subscribing, unsubscribing and other list information please see . http://www.majordomo.net/sinister . For questions about how the list works mail owner-sinister@majordomo.net . We're all happy bunnies humming happy bunny tunes. Aren't we? -----------------------------------------------------------------------