Hello, I would like to clear a few things up regarding my previous post. 1. I wanted a copy of "Tigermilk" on tape. I was going to put it on a recordable CD (this process apparently takes 3 hours !) to save me having to keep it on tape. My tape player eats tapes and a copy would last a fortnight. 2. It is costing me an Inspiral Carpets milk bottle (down to my last 2 now) to get it copied. 3. I was never intending to bootleg it at all. Merely recording it on to CD as opposed to cassette. Is there a difference between different recording medias ? Where does mini disc stand ? So many people have had cassettes copied for them - are they too going to be threatened by legal action by Jeepster ? If I was going to be starting a widespread bootlegging operation (which would be hard without any relevant equipment) would I really have advertised so blatantly this fact, knowing full well that people close to the band are on this list ? When I referred to copying, I meant onto tape cassette. I would have thought a master copy on CD would have been better to tape off than continually using tapes (I know owners of originals don`t play theirs often). 4. Finally, could I say how shocked I was when I got this in my mailbox: "Dear David, Please note that it is illegal to bootleg onto CD, and that if you are found to be breaking the law in this way, Jeepster will not hesitate to take legal action against you." Not EMI, or Warners, or Polygram. But Jeepster. Thanks, you made my day (not). Cheers, David (Feeling down and a bit disillusioned). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- . This message was brought to you by the Sinister mailing list. . To send to the list please mail "sinister@majordomo.net". . For subscribing, unsubscribing and other list information please see . http://www.majordomo.net/sinister . For questions about how the list works mail owner-sinister@majordomo.net . Nee nee mun pish, chan pai dee kwa -----------------------------------------------------------------------