i don't know if this is the case or not but it would seem to fit in with
In a message dated 98-02-24 16:22:50 EST, anonclothing@email.msn.com writes: << chatting to an A&R man friend of mine last weekend i said me: why don't you sign B&S (he works for a major label) him: i hear they are a nightmare to work with me: in what way him: well apparantly they vote on everything they do and if one of the band votes against it they don't do it. i couldn't work with a band like that it would kill me.>>> An assessment: Here's the best band, arguably, of the 9tees, and you're friend doesn't want to work with them because they have in place some sort of democratic system of self-management and decision making? This coming from an industry where you'd assume an A&R man's work responsibilities and problems range from drugs and alcohol abuse situations to creative stagnation and ego- maniacs. I'd think any A&R man in his right mind would jump at the chance to sign B&S, even with the band being so daring as to exercise their right to do what they choose rather than be directed around by someone with "experience" in the business. the general lack of gigs and new records. >> Okay, now Tigermilk came out in the summer of 96, which means the band hasn't even reached the official age of two. They've put out two lp's and enough ep's to equal a third. And album three may very well be in our hands by this summer. Perhaps we are letting our love of B&S override our patience. No comment on the live-gig situation. yours, nathaniel ----------------------------------------------------------------------- . This message was brought to you by the Sinister mailing list. . To send to the list please mail "sinister@majordomo.net". . For subscribing, unsubscribing and other list information please see . http://www.majordomo.net/sinister . For questions about how the list works mail owner-sinister@majordomo.net . We're all happy bunnies humming happy bunny tunes. Aren't we? -----------------------------------------------------------------------