it is interesting - to think that one can be in so much love - and be in so much sadness - it is not right - nor is it healthy - to have the perfect person infront of you - to be sleeping with the man you want to be with forever - and have it all decided by distances - is not right - i was told this last weekend - that i couldn't love someone - nor could he love me - because we lived more then two hours apart - and that to him - it was not an option - to be in or even start a relationship with such a great vast of land seperating us - i thought that it was bull at first - i mean - as i asked - why do you suddenly feel this way? - never before had he expressed any interesting in building a romance - althougth one was already firmly in place - and never before had he said that he didn't want a long distance one - and i will agree - long distance relationships are doomed to failure - but this situation is different - the type of feelings expressed and shown go far beyond anything i have yet experienced - but it was not be be - he said it can not be - he said he did love me - and if i lived in town we would be togeather for the rest of his time - but not now - and not like this - so now i am thinking - that for one to be in love - perhaps one must be sad - so i pose this question - to feel love - do you have to feel complete sadness? do you have to hit rock bottom to know the highs? - thank you for listening - -s.lord ------------------------------------------------------ what we place most hopes upon, generally proves most fatal - vicar of wakefield _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8 is here: Try it free* for 2 months http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +---+ Brought to you by the Sinister mailing list +---+ To send to the list mail sinister@missprint.org. To unsubscribe send "unsubscribe sinister" or "unsubscribe sinister-digest" to majordomo@missprint.org. WWW: http://www.missprint.org/sinister +-+ "sinsietr is a bit freaky" - stuart david, looper +-+ +-+ "legion of bedroom saddo devotees" "peculiarly deranged fanbase" +-+ +-+ "pasty-faced vegan geeks... and we LOST!" - NME April 2000 +-+ +-+ "frighteningly named Sinister List organisation" - NME May 2000 +-+ +-+ "sick posse of f**ked in the head psycho-fans" - NME June 2001 +-+ +-+ Nee, nee mun pish, chan pai dee kwa +-+ +-+ Snipp snapp snut, sa var sagan slut! +-+ +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+