There are three reasons an artist or band might not want to choose re-release: 1) They (along with a label) feel that they could make the money back. 2) They are not 100% happy with the songs. 3) They enjoy the fact the record is rare and unattainable.
How about 4) The publicity surrounding a rare record is good for the band? I know B&S are renowned for avoiding publicity in the form of photos, interviews etc., but that actually increases interest in the band; the fact that they are doing things differently by not publicising themselves as much as bands like Embrace has, ironically, given them great publicity. Similarly, it seems to me that by saying nothing about Tigermilk, and not making a fuss about re-releasing it, they have created priceless interest in the band. Whether these tactics are accidental or extremely canny I wouldn't know, but I suspect the latter. If they did ever put it out again though, I think it would be best if; a) it had a different sleeve, and b) it wasn't released on vinyl. That way the old copies would still have that exclusivity about them which some people seem to crave, and they would still be worth a packet (which I suspect may be the reason why some people don't want it reissued ;-) ). Stuart G ----------------------------------------------------------------------- . This message was brought to you by the Sinister mailing list. . To send to the list please mail "sinister@majordomo.net". . For subscribing, unsubscribing and other list information please see . http://www.majordomo.net/sinister . For questions about how the list works mail owner-sinister@majordomo.net -----------------------------------------------------------------------