Describe to me what sort of music you like in less than a sentence and most likely you'll find some sort of stereotypical label. I'm loathe to believe that a world without definitions is a good world. I think that you're reacting to the manner in which people judge harshly without examining a subject themselves - I'd say an entirely different matter than actually giving a name to something like "modernism" or "alternative" or "classic rock". While it's good to be open-minded, I don't like "fusion" much for example, whereas I might like "contemporary classical". Useful definitions I'd say. As for splitting hairs about where groups lie, I think that the more specific the characteristics of the classifications, the more likely a group spans multiple sets. Senor Droolcup At 02:04 AM 12/7/98 +0100, Massimiliano Bernardini wrote:
I'm a person! I don't need labels. Music don't need labels. B&S don't too.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +---+ Brought to you by the Sinister mailing list +---+ To send to the list please mail "sinister@majordomo.net". To unsubscribe send "unsubscribe sinister" or "unsubscribe sinister-digest" to "majordomo@majordomo.net". For list archives and searching, list rules, FAQ, poor jokes etc, see http://www.majordomo.net/sinister +---+ "legion of bedroom saddo devotees" +---+ +-+ "the cardie wearing biscuit nibbling belle & sebastian list" +-+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------+