Copied to the list: let this be an end to the discussion of list content please. Jarrod, I'll assume you sent your mails before you saw mine to the list. Please don't misunderstand me. I'd never in a thousand years say people shouldn't criticise the band, or the label on this list. I don't think you did anything wrong in giving your opinions of the LP, such as you heard it via MP3. We differ a little in your style of delivery, but that's a personal matter, not a list protocol matter. And strong and varying opinions are the meat of any mailing list. So far so good. But please understand this list has rules, and you signed up for them when you subscribed. They've evolved over a long time, involved a lot of people, who have reached a powerful consensus over how to make a mailing list this big and this active survive. They took a lot of time and a lot of patient care by a lot of people who worked to make this list what it is today, and that work continues, by the kind people who take time to mail me. I therefore can't help but wince a little when you say:
The rules of the list seem as ridiculous as those in The Cider House Rules, should any of you read the book.
Forgive me, that stings a little. This is your opinion. But this list has rules, others don't have so many, or none, and you make your own choices where to live. And that's fine.
It's a bit of a joke, really, that there are rules at all,
We differ.
as lists like this not only provide a forum for celebration for a band, but a much needed trading of new and different ideas and such.
Very very true. And not just celebration, and not just the band.
You can't regulate such a thing without there being lines drawn, and emotions upset.
I believe exactly the opposite, and I think the current episode shows that. And we both agree that lines being drawn are sometimes a good things, sometimes bad I think.
So I'm all for dropping any rules, and having a free for all..
Jarrod, this is non-negotiable. You're allowed to mail *me* and discuss list content, and I promise faithfully to project true opinion about the list by the majority of members as it's communicated to me. I don't want to and won't run a list that the majority of members don't like. Besides, they'll just leave. Nothing in the FAQ limits discussion of any content on the list, apart from discussion of list content itself, which you indulge in here; it's outlawed for the reasons outlined in my list mail, and this consensus was reached after bitter experiences on this and other lists. The other thing that's outlawed is outright vicious flaming, which no-one's quite done yet, happily. People criticise the band, the label, and should feel very free to do so too if they think their cause is just. I'd just like to avoid false oppositions, and if we're criticising an individual band member or whatever, I'd like to make very sure they get the same courtesy as anyone else. It's a question of tone, I guess. Finally just a couple of minor things. Please remember to ask people if you're posting exerpts from private mails they sent you: it's courtesy, and actually lawful to do this. I'm sure none of the people you quoted mind, and maybe you asked them all, if so disregard this. Secondly please do be careful about sending mails twice to Sinister. We have a lot of list traffic and it helps to keep the volume down. Thanks, Honey +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +---+ Brought to you by the undead Sinister mailing list +---+ To send to the list mail sinister@missprint.org. To unsubscribe send "unsubscribe sinister" or "unsubscribe sinister-digest" to majordomo@missprint.org. WWW: http://www.missprint.org/sinister +-+ "legion of bedroom saddo devotees" "tech-heads and students" +-+ +-+ "the cardie wearing biscuit nibbling belle & sebastian list" +-+ +-+ "sinsietr is a bit freaky" - stuart david, looper +-+ +-+ "pasty-faced vegan geeks... and we LOST!" - NME April 2000 +-+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------+