i guess when a band produces something different it is considered a shame. maybe radiohead shouldn't have made they're first album. since its SO different. i guess i'm a big idiot because i thought when you listened to music, you were listening to someone's creative perspective. catchy pop tunes and repeatitive drum beats are produced in mass quantities. when a band like radiohead produces an album like this, you should listen. not with your ears. but with your mind. some of the comments about kid-a have been extremly closed minded. in my opinion, any musician willing to make music and distribute it to millions of homes deserve a bit more respect. and yeah, i bet if belle and sebastian made an experimental album that sounded completely different everyone would say "Oh, how wonderfully different!" +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +---+ Brought to you by the undead Sinister mailing list +---+ To send to the list mail sinister@missprint.org. To unsubscribe send "unsubscribe sinister" or "unsubscribe sinister-digest" to majordomo@missprint.org. WWW: http://www.missprint.org/sinister +-+ "legion of bedroom saddo devotees" "tech-heads and students" +-+ +-+ "the cardie wearing biscuit nibbling belle & sebastian list" +-+ +-+ "sinsietr is a bit freaky" - stuart david, looper +-+ +-+ "pasty-faced vegan geeks... and we LOST!" - NME April 2000 +-+ +-+ "peculiarly deranged fanbase" "frighteningly named +-+ +-+ Sinister List organisation" - NME May 2000 +-+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------+