This Tigermilk debate seems to have escalated rather horrifically. A couple of points I'd like to add: The arguments (from digest 3/5/98) all seem to have been directed rather personally at David and Katrina. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't Katrina merely an employee of Jeepster? I would doubt that either she or David are directly or solely responsible for the labels position on the bootlegging matter. Personally, I would have preferred a form letter to Sinister list types to say 'we're overlooking taping of Tigermilk, but we'd rather you didn't burn it onto cd or, more specifically, offer cd copies to others.' (Where does everybody else think they should draw the line?) The thing is, there seems to be increasing bootlegging of Tigermilk from all quarters, so Jeepster clearly reckon the only way to try to control it is with the 'ton of bricks' approach. Possibly since they're so sick to death of the whole issue anyway. Since it rears its head so often, I would also assume that Jeepster have contacted the band about this, so their opinion would concur somewhat with what the owners of the music feel. Whatever, the whole episode seems to have taken an unpleasant turn with bad feelings on several fronts. It's only a bloody record after all. joss (hoping to return to the land of the lurkers) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- . This message was brought to you by the Sinister mailing list. . To send to the list please mail "sinister@majordomo.net". . For subscribing, unsubscribing and other list information please see . http://www.majordomo.net/sinister . For questions about how the list works mail owner-sinister@majordomo.net . Nee, nee mun pish, chan pai dee kwa -----------------------------------------------------------------------