Sinister: POWER MUSIC ELECTRIC REVIVAL!
So yes, i don;t write for a long time, then i write a little bit in response to a months worth of stuff. is that ok? first: HELLO!!! WHAT'S WRONG WITH RUVI? Nothing really, except for talking a lode of cack about necrophelia and pretty girls vs. smart girls...Ruvi is pretty Rad. yes, his first post about square-dancing was NEARLY PROUSTIAN. only much shorter. significantly shorter. he brought up sylvia plath who at least had the guts to stick her head in the oven unlike that dreadful elizabeth smart woman who lived forever and ever and wrote terrible books. the best thing about sylvia plath so far is that talk of her compelled jillian locke to post! rah!
Pinefox asked: Is it true, by the way, that Pynchonians just don't like Salinger?
yes. PF also mentioned David Lodge. i don;t like david lodge. he's no Ruvi whatsisface is he? with his nudge nudge wink wink i've heard of structuralism before sort of nonsense. fuck that shit. it is not the nation of ulysses! it's not even Komeda B-Sides.
Peter Miller said: You can get Deep Purple wallpaper!
and i was amazed to discover that you can purchase a YES earthenware beer stein! http://shopping.artistdirect.com/artist_catalog.asp?catalog=YES&store=YesDir ect perfect for all those times you get together with other prog-rock/role playing games friends of yours and drink yourselves into stupours while loudly exclaiming 'i am the dungeon master!' or 'you shit head! you killed my orc commander! now taste my steel!' etc... then you wake up with beastly hangovers and have to crawl back to the computer engineering building in yr semen stained track suit dreaming of your next chance to listen to music about trolls and gobblins and shit with your other dandruff-y friends while playing roleplaying games and griping about how you never get any 'action'. Youn J. Noh mentioned me, so i'll quote the entire paragraph:
Who is the person who said something like the response to a work of art should be a work of art? What were his exact words? A former professor quoted him and emphasized the role of inspiration, but I think of it as a conversation. Where is Steven Kado when you need him? Maybe he could say something enlightening about Wittgenstein at this point. There's an endpoint to criticism that isn't always recognized: you can never get at the work itself. I think Jason McKinnon was saying something like this. And the correspondence between words and things in the world is imperfect. It would be useful to talk about something on its own terms, but what are these terms? And what are non-artists to do? Offer mixtapes and quote other people's poetry?
right: here's what i say. 1. i don't like the way people throw words like 'art' around. people could lose an eye or find themselves deligitemized by an entire cultural system! fuck that shit. 2. i side with Renzo Piano and say that intuition doesn't exist, its just the fact that people who know about things can make judgements about those things faster without having to recourse to 'external' systems of reasoning. 3. Wittgenstein would ask how you know when you're inspired and if you are how do you know that its called inspiration to tell someone else that you're inspired and such and so on...colour incompatibility...etc. 4. no you can t ever get at the work of art. i agree. what was the work of art anyway? 5. its important to be sure that when talking about the imperfect connection between words and 'reality' that we don't lapse into rude and lazy platonism...in these modern times this can only lead to baudrillard and thats sucky, since he's really just an old reactionary shit-head who wants to go back to a time when men were men and women were women and reality was reality...what a tired old fart. i'm out of juice on this one. i need more kimchi to get any real thinking done, but its still early afternoon as i write so i can't possibly eat kimchi just yet. i don't think i even addressed the question at all. clearly. i'm going to see some joseph cornell films tonite! rah! yes, its a wonderful world within these cinema walls. The Dave Matthews Band is bad like Israeli Trance. boo! did anyone else find that the new baxendale joint is like a kind of anthem for a new tomorrow? a mission statement even...a kind of flashlight of hope? no? sorry. someone didn't like physicists. i take great umbrage at this statement since a) one of my best friends is in physics b) my girlfriend is also in physics. and they are nice people and not at all creepy or stupid or lax or anything, to be frank they're probably acres cooler than you, so there! of course me and the rest of the young barthesians in the wanky semiotics dept. find anything remotely sciency to be mind-bendingly exotic so maybe i look at physics with rose coloured glasses or something. Greg Pallis is pretty fucking rad too, despite having made an ass of me to his teacher by printing out one of my hamfisted drunken rants...oh well. the remarkably named dairy fairy said:
I am going to see arab strap this friday. Which should be very good. Although not necessarily a gig to cheer myself up with. >Aidan Moffat never seems very happy, despite the fact that the content of his songs would suggest he's having an awful lot of >sex. which is always nice.
not neccessarily. sometimes too much sex makes your bits ache. can anyone who speaks german tell me how to say 'architects against indie-rock' in german? i'd be really grateful. rah rah ! i am electrocution! s t e v e n +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +---+ Brought to you by the Sinister mailing list +---+ To send to the list mail sinister@missprint.org. To unsubscribe send "unsubscribe sinister" or "unsubscribe sinister-digest" to majordomo@missprint.org. WWW: http://www.missprint.org/sinister +-+ "sinsietr is a bit freaky" - stuart david, looper +-+ +-+ "legion of bedroom saddo devotees" "peculiarly deranged fanbase" +-+ +-+ "pasty-faced vegan geeks... and we LOST!" - NME April 2000 +-+ +-+ "frighteningly named Sinister List organisation" - NME May 2000 +-+ +-+ Nee, nee mun pish, chan pai dee kwa +-+ +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
sinister! why are good shoes so hard to find? does a search for good shoes justify a trip to japan? does it justify certain resultant poverty? i have a feeling i've talked about this before. but themes come around and around. also! i know a guy here in vancouver who looks *exactly* like the long-haired guy on the front of the new ep! except that he usually wears metal t-shirts and a mesh ballcap. so to see this was shocking. and then i saw him on the street yesterday, but he was too far away for me to flag him down and tell him about it/inquire about his true identity. reading ruvi's post, i'm reminded of wondering whether i'm going low brow lately. whether it's permanent or not, well, i mean, at least i'm reading theory. but what does that count for really, when i'm also watching wrestling twice a week (haven't gone so far as pay-per-view yet. yet.), reading things like 'the beach' and going to cheap night at the movies and thoroughly enjoying 'the mummy 2'. yes, i've heard there's a fine line between clever and stupid and that there's this thing called irony, but i don't know, i'd rather not think about it and enjoy things. (but sometimes it catches me by surprise and i end up thinking about these things. agh. but it's also interesting b/c mick foley's biography also makes me think about these things. it's some good stuff.) i'm reminded also by steven kado's latest astounding post, of another post of his. maybe i'm looking at this through rose-coloured glasses, but remember s.kado's POWER MUSIC ELECTRIC REVIVAL! post was the stuff of genius. it made me want to read books that make my arms cramp up from holding them in scholarly ways. but he wrote that a long time ago now... yaaay archives! speaking of archives, cheese really does bring people together doesn't it? search "cheese" in the archives - so much proof. yes, belle and sebastian may have brought us together, but cheese is what keeps us going. also a while ago, marybeth said 'euchre', which is an addictive game that goes well with beer and other things. i never actually tried to spell it though, as i was taught by friends and not books, which makes me think of oral history and how spelling is perhaps fairly arbitrary and subjective. and therefore a bit of a joke on those who get left out of the spelling process (yes, you can see samuel johnson holding his belly and laughing, can you not?) i would probably spell euchre 'yuker' b/c phonetics is so fun. (or ph...nevermind.) pardon my logic james thornely said of drugs that they shouldn't be done. and then he said he smokes cigarettes. um... (and this is certainly not personal to james, do not take it that way, please) 'doing drugs' emcompases quite a lot, from the casual muncher of mushrooms to the eighth-a-day pot smoker to the shooting-up-in-a-downtown-alleyway heroin addict. the only reason it doesn't 'officially' include smoking is b/c smoking is legal and makes so many people so much money (i'm not forgetting perscription drugs - it's just all so much.) yes, so even though that 'don't do drugs' ad with the looper song has the looper song, it still has a far too general 'don't do drugs' message which is still just as vague/laughable as the 'don't do drugs' campaigns of the past four decades. to be blunt, not sharp, i'd rather have a few acid flashbacks in my 50s than a chest full of cancer. to be sharp, neither of these is, of course, guaranteed to happen. something about excess and abuse/addiction being my eventual point here, probably. ie., addiction bad, drugs not necessarily so bad (this would be the 'people kill people' arguement.) ie., why deal with the drug when you should be dealing with the 'why' of it all, ie., can, worms, instigator, aaaah! how crappy was '13 days'? i saw it on the plane and wanted to leave. only highlight being the (slight) irony of canadian bruce greenwood playing jfk. which wore off so quickly. i'm all about entertainment these days, like actually being entertained. which is probably making me less entertaining... er. anyway, ruvi reminded me that i don't find kings of convenience entertaining either. but perhaps it's just the mood i've been in for the past few months. i have no idea. i just wanted to say hello. and layeth the smacketh down! robyn ===== I was reading the dictionary. I thought it was a poem about everything. ~Steven Wright ~~~ Robyn Fadden rfadden@yahoo.com Vancouver, BC __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +---+ Brought to you by the Sinister mailing list +---+ To send to the list mail sinister@missprint.org. To unsubscribe send "unsubscribe sinister" or "unsubscribe sinister-digest" to majordomo@missprint.org. WWW: http://www.missprint.org/sinister +-+ "sinsietr is a bit freaky" - stuart david, looper +-+ +-+ "legion of bedroom saddo devotees" "peculiarly deranged fanbase" +-+ +-+ "pasty-faced vegan geeks... and we LOST!" - NME April 2000 +-+ +-+ "frighteningly named Sinister List organisation" - NME May 2000 +-+ +-+ Nee, nee mun pish, chan pai dee kwa +-+ +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
participants (2)
-
Robyn Fadden -
Steven Kado