Alright, yeah, sorry about that one. I wasn't really thinking when I said that Tigermilk should not be re - released. I think I just felt like saying something a bit controversial, especially after having felt a bit pissed off about the Manics / Smiths comment. It was most definitely a heat of the moment thing, which I hope you will all understand when I tell you that I don't, in fact, have even a copy of Tigermilk. Having thought about it, I would love to see Tigermilk on the shelves of Virgin, HMV et al, so that everyone could hear the pleasures of what (as I understand) is a landmark album. I do, however, happen to think that there would be some people, whether a minority or not, who would start whingeing and moaning if it were re - released; not really because of the collectable value of the record, but due to their "I got there first" mentality. Yes, I agree, music is for everyone to share and appreciate, but I seem to encounter, far too often, people who express the above mentality about some band as soon as they get anywhere near famous, like they want to hoard all that band's music for themselves. Quite a childish attitude to take. So, once again, sorry for being so stupid and not thinking about what I was writing. I've learnt my lesson! Chris. P.S. I don't believe I've ever been called 'sir' and 'arse' in the same sentence before. Harsh, but fair! ----------------------------------------------------------------------- . This message was brought to you by the Sinister mailing list. . To send to the list please mail "sinister@majordomo.net". . For subscribing, unsubscribing and other list information please see . http://www.majordomo.net/sinister . For questions about how the list works mail owner-sinister@majordomo.net -----------------------------------------------------------------------