Sinister: On the nature of love...
I have a question for all of the sensitive sinister kids who think about the nature of love as often as I do. I have had a crush on my best friend for some time now, and I was thinking about the idea of there being one "perfect" person out there for everyone. Basically what I mean by this is that there is one person that exists for someone else. They may not exist for the express purpose of being together, but it works you know? So my question is this. Is there such a thing as the "perfect" mate? I have my own ideas on this, but I was wondering what some of you kids thought. Let me know... Brandt +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +---+ Brought to you by the reborn Sinister mailing list +---+ To send to the list mail "sinister@majordomo.net". To unsubscribe send "unsubscribe sinister" or "unsubscribe sinister-digest" to "majordomo@majordomo.net". WWW: http://www.majordomo.net/sinister +-+ "legion of bedroom saddo devotees" "tech-heads and students" +-+ +-+ "the cardie wearing biscuit nibbling belle & sebastian list" +-+ +-+ "jelly-filled danishes" +-+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Dear Brandt, I wish I had time to write more but I am at work right now. I'm sure you realize that my or anyone else's idea of whether or not the "perfect" mate exists is quite relative so I won't bother making that disclaimer about my own opinions. I personally think that an omnipresent love is the common denominator behind all assumed "perfect" matches, well that and things the two people have in common. I think that love is something that always exists within us and it only shows itself when we meet someone that we can relate to and who seems compatible with us. So, unless you are the strangest, most unique person on earth, chances are that there are many people out there who could eventually be your "perfect" mate. I know by saying that, it may sound like I am cheapening the individual aspects of love, but of course when we are in a loving relationship we never want to admit that there is someone else out there who we could love equally and possible more so if you ever met them therefore we make ourselves believe (whether or not it is true) that the person we are with is the perfect one...until things fall apart, if they do, and we begin to question the existence of soulmates all over again. I have thought about the concept of soulmates quite often and although I have come to the conclusion that I just mentioned, it's not very comforting is it? It may be all well and good from a first person perspective, but when you sit there wondering if your mate is going to find someone he or she loves more than you, it's enough to drive one mad. I think there are some basic elements that if present in a relationship, will help keep it together despite individual differences. Trust, communication and open-mindedness. More often that not one person is either more trusting, communicative or open-minded than the other when a relationship fails. I think, although rare, when both people are equal in those aspects, they can overcome many, many things. I hope it doesn't sound like I am preaching or anything like that, I am just passionate about relationships. =) I really don't mean to disenchant the idea of soulmates because I think it is, at its base, a very valuable and real thing, but you just have to be careful that you are not misinterpreting things in common as signs of your perfect mate. I mean, if they are meant for you, don't you think they would be aware of your interest in them and possibly show the beginnings of a return of those feelings? But what do I know? I am not even in a relationship right now, but I digress...=) Before I go I want to leave you a quote spoken about a woman that the author has only seen once for a single hour and with whom he has never spoken (and it is taken a bit out of context so although it sounds a bit creepy coming from someone that has never met their object of affection, it is really intended as a devotional to womankind as a whole. He loves love but seems to have a problem with individual compatabilities or human relations): "...no matter who has ever loved you, he never loved you more than I do, no man ever granted you more power over himself, unqualified power. But I'm condemned to be untrue. I belong to those windy voices, who don't love women, who love only love. All of us wanderers are made like this. A good part of our wandering and homelessness is love, eroticism. The romanticism of wandering, at least half of it, is nothing else but a kind of eagerness for adventure. But the other half is another eagerness -- an unconcious drive to transfigure and dissolve the erotic. We wanderers are very cunning -- we develop those feelings which are impossible to fulfill; and the love which actually should belong to a woman, we lightly scatter among small towns and mountains, lakes and valleys, children by the side of the road, beggars on the bridge, cows in the pasture, birds and butterflies. We separate love from its object, love alone is enough for us, in the same way that, in wandering, we don't look for a goal, we only look for the happiness of wandering, only the wandering..." Although this quote is a bit dated I think it still has many modern day applications. I myself seem to be falling into the abyss that the author has. I have been in probably 3 or 4 relationships where the love I felt was and is pure, but my "personality" or "ego" could not in the end remain with theirs, despite the love. Love sometimes just isn't enough. I know this may sound cheesy and not well thought out, but my whole being aspires to love and be loved. Everything, and I mean everything else is secondary. My existence (not my personality) is love, I mean it is entirely composed of love...a love for life, and when I meet someone with whom I can share that bond, I "fall in love" with them too. I have spent too many years (how over-dramatic am I, at only 22) searching for my soulmate, when in truth it is love that I love. A few years ago, if I had been in a relationship with someone who said to me "I love love", my ego would immediately be hurt and I would start to question the validity of their love for me. I mean, do they just love being in love or do they truly love me? But now I realize that if someone said that to me, that they meant they love life and life's manifestation of love has respresented itself in the form of me. I hope I am not rambling too much. The more my ego dissolves the more and more of the big picture I am allowed to see, and now I understand that love is its own means and its own end. My god, it looks I did have time to write a lot. Thank you for bringing up that subject because instead of working for some 20 minutes I have been able to write a discourse on love =) I hope this at the very least doesn't hinder you any because I know it probably won't help...I tend to involve myself too much in trying to give advice to others. Thank you also for reading this far. I wish you the best of luck finding your "perfect" mate, whether or not it is your best friend. Until or if we speak again, take care of yourself... Justin W "Often I tried the frightening way of "reality," Where things that count are profession, law, fashion, finance, But disillusioned and freed I fled away alone To the other side, the place of dreams and blessed folly." - Hermann Hesse, Wanderings +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +---+ Brought to you by the reborn Sinister mailing list +---+ To send to the list mail "sinister@majordomo.net". To unsubscribe send "unsubscribe sinister" or "unsubscribe sinister-digest" to "majordomo@majordomo.net". WWW: http://www.majordomo.net/sinister +-+ "legion of bedroom saddo devotees" "tech-heads and students" +-+ +-+ "the cardie wearing biscuit nibbling belle & sebastian list" +-+ +-+ "jelly-filled danishes" +-+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
participants (2)
-
bfundak@bgnet.bgsu.edu -
Justin Williams