I too have just received a copy of Tigermilk and was really suprised at how good it is. First of all, there is much more variety in the sounds than on IYFS and I think Stuart's singing is more accomplished somehow. I had heard that B&S didn't want to rerelease it because they weren't proud of it but now I refuse to believe that. This got me thinking... you see my friends and I have a theory that really holds up... No band or musical artist has a long career unless their second record is better than their first record. This would make sense considering that the first record is usually comprised of songs written over a longer period of time, so the second record is a much greater test of the longevity of a songwriter. There is also usually a bigger budget for a second record. Anyway, I haven't heard Tigermilk enough times to call it better than IYFS yet and I would like to know what everyone thinks about this comparison. matrix ----------------------------------------------------------------------- . This message was brought to you by the Sinister mailing list. . To send to the list please mail "sinister@majordomo.net". . For subscribing, unsubscribing and other list information please see . http://www.majordomo.net/sinister . For questions about how the list works mail owner-sinister@majordomo.net -----------------------------------------------------------------------