Sinister: Kids in America
PITCHFORK REVIEW Funny one, that Pitchfork review. I don't love legalman (despite the fact I am a legal man and love nothing more than shouting about clauses 1, 2, 3 and 4) but I love the album and I can't see how legalman really relates to it. But hey what do I know? (lots and lots actually). As for bands being disappointing, it's an odd concept. I think six albums in eight years is a good return and it's not like there are any mid 80's Rolling Stones-esque embarrassments in the back catalogue.(I bet you Jagger wishes he wrote Track 3 off FYHC). I've been far more disappointed with other bands over the years. Back to the LP...It's my favourite Belles album since Twattybus (so that would be 1 and a soundtrack but still...)and it's probably better than Twattybus. KIDS IN AMERICA Are the majority of B&S fans Kids in America? Interesting one that. I can't answer it but if Sinister is taken as a sample the majority are UK based, non? SINISTER GOLD (Sky channel 268) It's good to see Sinister Gold in action what with the re-emergence of old posters. Which got me thinking- whatever happened to the sinister village? For those too young to remember it was a virtual village which featured members of Sinister. It was probably crap but at the time I was at University and helped me to waste the day in the library so I have rose tinted memories of it. ON LORD ANTHONY Incidentally, it was possibly around that time, (maybe a little earlier) when the Big Rumour went round that Lord Anthony would be released on a single with Middle Distance Runner and Paper Boat. So by my calculation Paper Boat might see the light of day in 2005. I prefer the live version of Lord A I've got where it was clearly Struan at an open-mic night as you can hear pint glasses being smashed and collected in the foreground. The DWC strings are very lush but you can't beat the smokey, beery ambience the live version contains PARANTHESES Yes, I realise there are far too many in the above post. P _________________________________________________________________ On the move? Get Hotmail on your mobile phone http://www.msn.co.uk/msnmobile +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +---+ Brought to you by the Sinister mailing list +---+ To send to the list mail sinister@missprint.org. To unsubscribe send "unsubscribe sinister" or "unsubscribe sinister-digest" to majordomo@missprint.org. WWW: http://www.missprint.org/sinister +-+ "sinsietr is a bit freaky" - stuart david, looper +-+ +-+ "legion of bedroom saddo devotees" "peculiarly deranged fanbase" +-+ +-+ "pasty-faced vegan geeks... and we LOST!" - NME April 2000 +-+ +-+ "frighteningly named Sinister List organisation" - NME May 2000 +-+ +-+ "sick posse of f**ked in the head psycho-fans" - NME June 2001 +-+ +-+ Nee, nee mun pish, chan pai dee kwa +-+ +-+ Snipp snapp snut, sa var sagan slut! +-+ +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
I think the pitchforkmedia review hits the nail right on the head, or in the coffin. The thing about old B&S music was that you felt like you were being let in on this little world. A world that was all slightly mysterious and esoteric. The sharp and strange lyrics, the minimal productions, lovely album covers, the little stories in the inlay card. When struan starts writing an online diary about how he is considering taking his laptop out on the bus and how bored he is, its the time when the songs start drifting away from this little secret life they all used to lead and start instead singing about legal men and offices. I think a lot of bands make the mistake of over exposure. Call me old fashioned, but I remember the days when reading a review in the NME(trash) or an interview was the nearest you ever got to your band. And yes they held your interest for longer. As soon as i start reading about what they had for breakfast its starts to seem like they are looking for my attention as opposed to the other way around. What strikes me about DCW is how over produced it is, step into my office, would be so much nicer without all these distracting extra instruments. The song that really stands out for me and I think everyone is Piazza, new york catcher. And it is purely because it is back to struan doing what he does best. Oblique lyrics with simple music and subject matter that no-one would ever considered for a pop song. I also really like stay loose, which I haven't heard many people mention. All in all I think it is a weaker album than FYHCYWLAP, but pitchfork is right, if you came to B&S in the legalman stages it sounds bubbly enough to be just another post modern sneer at a bygone era or two, but that was never B&S at there best. I'll still buy it, and I'll still sigh and wish stevie had left the band instead of Isobelle. richard P.S Belle and Sebastian have always been pretty small in britian whereas the college radio stations in America have made them much bigger stateside. All one has to do is look at the tour dates to see that. +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +---+ Brought to you by the Sinister mailing list +---+ To send to the list mail sinister@missprint.org. To unsubscribe send "unsubscribe sinister" or "unsubscribe sinister-digest" to majordomo@missprint.org. WWW: http://www.missprint.org/sinister +-+ "sinsietr is a bit freaky" - stuart david, looper +-+ +-+ "legion of bedroom saddo devotees" "peculiarly deranged fanbase" +-+ +-+ "pasty-faced vegan geeks... and we LOST!" - NME April 2000 +-+ +-+ "frighteningly named Sinister List organisation" - NME May 2000 +-+ +-+ "sick posse of f**ked in the head psycho-fans" - NME June 2001 +-+ +-+ Nee, nee mun pish, chan pai dee kwa +-+ +-+ Snipp snapp snut, sa var sagan slut! +-+ +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
participants (2)
-
Paul Arathoon -
Rask