I bought Purple Rain on DVD the other day for £5.99. Y'know the Prince movie? The thing is I can't stop watching it. I'm obsessed. The man is such a star - the moves, the tunes, the wailing guitar solos. And then there's Wendy & Lisa - in fact the whole of The Revolution rule. They make the Strokes look like the rich kid dullards that they really are. Anyhow I'll try not to bring up Prince again. Forgive me if I go astray. damn... I didn't get DCW until Friday. I'm stuck in the sticks with only a Woolworth's and they weren't stocking it. So it wasn't until I travelled to London to play a disastrous gig (oh! the horror!) that I could pick up a copy. Now having been a B&S fan since the first time I heard them (Lazy Line Painter Jane on The Chart Show if you're interested) and generally a little disappointed with the overall Fold Your Hands Child album (don't get me wrong - it's good album, there are some corkers on it - but also some clunkers) I wasn't really expecting a great album. Add to this my own Logan's Run style theory that bands should only release 4 studio albums within 4 - 7 years (ideally 5 years) and then split AND all the negativity about the album from the old school hardcore fans I was prepared to be disappointed. However, the albums great, Mad Murdoch's sleeve notes are even better. I've been mocked for years about my fear of going into specialist shops (music, art & craft, camera, dry cleaners, etc.) and now I know that Stuart UNDERSTANDS. Anyhow - the music. Personally I think Trevor Horn coming in as producer was a great move - after 3 years of treading water (although with often entertaining results) I think B&S sound more focussed than they have since '98. I know it's not a classic album but it's so vibrant. The arrangements are faultless, all the songs are at least 4 out of 5, vocally they've never sounded so good, stevie's guitar solos are rampant ...my god, what's up with all the haters? I know there's no Isobel (which hurts me a lot more than it probably hurts you), I know the album doesn't start with a hushed Murdoch epic like the others do but isn't progression the key to being a great band (the Beatles, the Beach Boys, Take That, etc.). Do we really want Stuart Murdoch to keep rewriting Fox In The Snow over and over again? I know DCW isn't as good as Tigermilk but what is? Tigermilk was a statement, a stand, a call to arms - you can't repeat a moment like that - especially once you've won. Tigermilk was Stuart Murdoch's Purple Rain... ...oh damn, Phil M. +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +---+ Brought to you by the Sinister mailing list +---+ To send to the list mail sinister@missprint.org. To unsubscribe send "unsubscribe sinister" or "unsubscribe sinister-digest" to majordomo@missprint.org. WWW: http://www.missprint.org/sinister +-+ "sinsietr is a bit freaky" - stuart david, looper +-+ +-+ "legion of bedroom saddo devotees" "peculiarly deranged fanbase" +-+ +-+ "pasty-faced vegan geeks... and we LOST!" - NME April 2000 +-+ +-+ "frighteningly named Sinister List organisation" - NME May 2000 +-+ +-+ "sick posse of f**ked in the head psycho-fans" - NME June 2001 +-+ +-+ Nee, nee mun pish, chan pai dee kwa +-+ +-+ Snipp snapp snut, sa var sagan slut! +-+ +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+