Sinister: Favourite track

[95516123 at xxx.uk]

>          I would agree with you on the covers front. 'Dog..' was VERY
>          Smithsian almost to the point of self-parody. A sure fire
>          case of wearing influences on your sleeve. I'm also reminded
>          of the old Woodentops and, to an extent Housemartins,
>          sleeves. Anyone else have an opinion?

Funny, I never thought of the Smiths with the Dog on Wheels cover, but
yesterday when I saw the cover of  3..6..9 I thought of them immediatly.
 The colours reminded me of "Rank".  I like the B & S covers,  very
nice.  And I like the wee stories.  The smiths never gave you a wee
story.

The last band who's covers I loved were that of Suede.  Remember the
white backgrounds with the 'artistic' images on the front?  I was gutted
when they stopped doing them.

I'm very talkative today, aren't I?

Chris




          Hi Chris.

          I haven't seen the cover of the new ep - but I'm going to
          buy it today after uni. I was at a club in Edinburgh last
          Saturday and they played a couple of tracks from it which
          was of course excellent.  I know what you mean about the
          Suede covers - I saw an article about them somewhere which
          also included most of the old covers which was nice and made
----------me dig them out to look at.

          The Archdeacon of Pop

           .----------------------------------


          .     This message was brought to you by the Sinister
          mailing list. .        To send to the list please mail
          "sinister at majordomo.net". .  For subscribing, unsubscribing
          and other list information please see
.            http://www.majordomo.net/sinister
. For questions about how the list works mail owner-sinister at majordomo.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
Received: from envy.ph.ed.ac.uk (129.215.72.168) by CSUNT2.napier.ac.uk with
SMTP
  (IMA Internet Exchange 2.1 Enterprise) id 0001710A; Tue, 14 Oct 97 17:41:00
+0000
Received: (from majordomo at localhost) by envy.ph.ed.ac.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) id
QAA14656 for sinister-outgoing; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 16:17:27 +0100
Received: from renko.ucs.ed.ac.uk (renko.ucs.ed.ac.uk [129.215.13.3]) by
envy.ph.ed.ac.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA14652 for
<sinister at majordomo.net>; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 16:17:23 +0100
Received: from us.net (laurel.us.net [198.240.72.4])
	by renko.ucs.ed.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA05552
	for <sinister at majordomo.net>; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 16:17:58 +0100 (BST)
Received: from chicago.uu.net ([208.221.247.2] (may be forged))
	by us.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id LAA02608
	for <sinister at majordomo.net>; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 11:12:15 -0400 (EDT)
X-Provider: US Net - Advanced Internet Services - (301) 572-5926 - info at us.net
	    Where Business Connects! (tm) -- http://www.us.net/
Received: by chicago.uu.net with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail
Connector Version 4.0.994.63)
	id <01BCD888.32F218D0 at chicago.uu.net>; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 10:01:54 -0500
Received: from duct.mail.pipex.net by chicago.uu.net with SMTP (Microsoft
Exchange Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.63)
	id XTYCWBDK; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 10:01:42 -0500
Received: (qmail 155 invoked from network); 14 Oct 1997 15:11:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cardhu.murrayj.com) (194.131.244.15)
  by relay.pipex.net with SMTP; 14 Oct 1997 15:11:55 -0000
Received: by cardhu.murrayj.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Server Internet
Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.63)
	id <01BCD8BB.F3FCDB90 at cardhu.murrayj.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 16:12:22 +0100
Message-ID:
<c=US%a=_%p=Murray_Johnstone%l=CHICAGO9710141501XTYCWBDK at chicago.uu.net>
From: Chris Leonard <cleonard at xxx.COM>
To: "'Sinister'" <sinister at majordomo.net>
Subject: Re[2]: Sinister: Favourite track
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 10:12:21 -0500
X-Mailer:  Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.63
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Chris Leonard <cleonard at MURRAYJ.COM>