Sinister: bootlegs
Hopkins T
t.hopkins at xxx.uk
Tue Jan 13 11:12:25 GMT 1998
> David wrote:
>
> > > > belle and sebastian may be wavering over the re-issue of tigermilk
> but they
> > > > have stated publicly that this is something they plan, more a
> question of
> > > > when.
> > > > as such bootlegging would be a serious threat to it's imminent
> success and
> > > > would threaten to reduce the revenue that the band would receive.
>
> I am all for the band making as much money from their efforts as
> possible, and think that any bootleg which significantly damaged
> their
> earnings off Tigermilk would be a Very Bad Thing.
> But hey, let's be realistic. The reason I hear for the
> non-appearance of a reissue is that there is not enough time to
> release it
> properly. I assume this means that with the current recording and
> forthcoming promotion for the new records, the band will not have
> time to
> promote it 'properly'.
> It seems to me that to me that the reissue of Tigermilk is on hold
> for commercial reasons, then: it is being delayed so that
> (i) the reissue can be promoted in such a way as to maximise sales,
> which is a good thing, but also
> (ii) to increase the 'great lost album' myth, and to generate an
> ever more hysterical demand for it.
>
> Whilst this is fine, and probably very good business, people who try
> to manipulate the tiger of the supply-demand consumer economy should
> not be
> surprised when the damn thing turns round and bites them.
> There are people in this world who make their living from
> bootlegging records. My guess is that none of them read this list,
> but I may
> be wrong. As the fame of Tigermilk spreads, and the price it fetches
> rises,
> it becomes more likely that it will be systematically bootlegged.
>
> >the difference between a tape and cd recording is one of quality,
> >but not a
> >perceivable difference unless you're incredibly fussy. a tape is
> >poorer quality
> >and as such would not be used to produce bootlegs from, cd's on the
> >other hand
> >are accepted as a standard for a master recording and can be used
> >in
> >mass-duplication facilities to produce large runs of bootleg cd's.
> >... it must be realised that should a mass production of
> >Tigermilk on cd ever originate illegally, it would probably have
> >been done by
> >someone that we (as the list) know. simply because it is us (the
> >fans, friends,
> >record company, etc) that own the original vinyl Tigermilk, so it
> >is most likely
> >that the cd used would have originated from one of us (as it is
> >unlikely that a
> >cd produced from a tape would be accepted by any but the most
> >worthless
> >bootleggers). this is one of the most horrible realisations on this
> >subject, and
> >it is this i would love to prevent.
>
> Except that the survey a few months ago tracked down just 10% of
> total Tigermilkage world-wide. The profits involved in selling, say
> 1000
> bootlegs would mean that a copy of the LP on the collectors market
> (lets say
> ?300 for the sake of argument) would represent a good financial
> investment
> on the part of our prospective Belle bandit.
> I wouldn't worry too much about our friends in this case...though I
> might be wrong.
>
> > we can serve ourselves and protect the band
> >we love simply by restricting our own copies to tape format and not
> >a digital
> >(master) format.
>
> It's just as likely that the bootlegger would use a vinyl copy,
> surely? Giving access to the cover and the credits etc...
> I hope all you minidisk users are hanging your heads, with your
> master formats.:-)
> I'm still in tape-based servitude.
>
> I am not trying to defend bootlegging of the LP. Neither do I
> disagree that Tigermilk owners should exercise some discretion. I
> just think
> that, if there are worries about bootlegs damaging earnings, they
> come as a
> direct result of the decision not to reissue earlier. A decision
> which has
> left a lot of fans (myself included) desperate for a copy of
> Tigermilk which
> will be a little more permanent than tape.
>
> Just a thought.
>
> Tim
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
. This message was brought to you by the Sinister mailing list.
. To send to the list please mail "sinister at majordomo.net".
. For subscribing, unsubscribing and other list information please see
. http://www.majordomo.net/sinister
. For questions about how the list works mail owner-sinister at majordomo.net
. We're all happy bunnies humming happy bunny tunes. Aren't we?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Sinister
mailing list