Sinister: Keith: Is he or isn't he?

[Honey]

> I was only sharing a little story -- it was meant as a commentary on the oft-
> recurring *discussion* about Stuart's orientation, not on his personal life
> itself. 

Exactly - as Susannah pointed out Keith's just trying to shag someone
famous.  He tried it with Roger Whittaker and now he's trying it with
someone else.  I thought the story was a nice comment on this silly
ongoing debate about is-he isnt-he, almost as if someone's been following
it on the list and giggling at it.

Matthew Hintz got closest to what I think anyway - it's all bunk and I
suspect sexuality's not half as clear in people's lives as it's made out
to be for reasons of personal or political expediency.  What I want to
understand is not who people go to bed with but where the things
they say connect with my life and how they help me understand what I feel.
So, please, let's not pick apart Stuart's lyrics to look for "signs" for
goodness sake - it's intrusive and what does it tell us about anything?
I suspect that's all Keith's saying too. 

Honey xxx

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.     This message was brought to you by the Sinister mailing list.
.        To send to the list please mail "sinister at majordomo.net".
.  For subscribing, unsubscribing and other list information please see
.            http://www.majordomo.net/sinister
. For questions about how the list works mail owner-sinister at majordomo.net
.    We're all happy bunnies humming happy bunny tunes.  Aren't we?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------