Sinister: linguistic trainspotting
Musicman
lrsim2 at xxx.au
Thu Mar 12 11:00:02 GMT 1998
hmmmm, slacks.....
> Say, since this list has already tackled spawny gits & the bar vs.
> biscuit conundrum, I was hoping someone could take a crack at the
> significance of 'pants.' Clearly, it is undesirable to be deemed pants,
> but why? To Americans pants are just, I guess you'd say, 'trousers.'
> Surely there are more disagreeable items of apparel to be compared to:
> jock strap, thong, adult diaper... Please explain.
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
. This message was brought to you by the Sinister mailing list.
. To send to the list please mail "sinister at majordomo.net".
. For subscribing, unsubscribing and other list information please see
. http://www.majordomo.net/sinister
. For questions about how the list works mail owner-sinister at majordomo.net
. We're all happy bunnies humming happy bunny tunes. Aren't we?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Sinister
mailing list