Sinister: linguistic trainspotting

Musicman lrsim2 at xxx.au
Thu Mar 12 11:00:02 GMT 1998


hmmmm, slacks.....

> Say, since this list has already tackled spawny gits & the bar vs. 
> biscuit conundrum, I was hoping someone could take a crack at the 
> significance of 'pants.'  Clearly, it is undesirable to be deemed pants, 
> but why? To Americans pants are just, I guess you'd say, 'trousers.'  
> Surely there are more disagreeable items of apparel to be compared to:  
> jock strap, thong, adult diaper... Please explain.
> 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.     This message was brought to you by the Sinister mailing list.
.        To send to the list please mail "sinister at majordomo.net".
.  For subscribing, unsubscribing and other list information please see
.            http://www.majordomo.net/sinister
. For questions about how the list works mail owner-sinister at majordomo.net
.    We're all happy bunnies humming happy bunny tunes.  Aren't we?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------



More information about the Sinister mailing list