Sinister: overanalysis

[n|ck g]

i have been on this list for a little bit now and read almost every posting, 
as i have nothing really to do all day at work. i have never posted but i 
have noticed a trend to the postings. almost all of them are extremely fun 
to read but once in a while a few individuals - to remain nameless - get 
stuck on a subject and feel the need to completely over analize it; beating 
mercilously till there is no need to bludgen it anymore and then kicking it 
a few more times.

two cases in point. the word "fey" and the subject matter of "pink floyd" 
(sp?)

if one were to have a question on the meaning of a word, wouldn't it be 
easier to just look it up in the dictionary? i mean he was using the word 
incorectly anyways.

on the subject of pink floyd: why are we talking about such things in the 
first place?

i appologize to anyone that i might have offended. this in no way is a 
malicious email to anyone. i greatly enjoy 99% of the postings. keep it 
real.

nw

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
    +---+  Brought to you by the undead Sinister mailing list  +---+
    To send to the list mail sinister at missprint.org. To unsubscribe
    send "unsubscribe sinister" or "unsubscribe sinister-digest" to
    majordomo at missprint.org.  WWW: http://www.missprint.org/sinister
 +-+  "legion of bedroom saddo devotees" "tech-heads and students"  +-+
 +-+  "the cardie wearing biscuit nibbling belle & sebastian list"  +-+
 +-+       "sinsietr is a bit freaky" - stuart david, looper        +-+
 +-+   "pasty-faced vegan geeks... and we LOST!" - NME April 2000   +-+
 +-+       "peculiarly deranged fanbase" "frighteningly named       +-+
 +-+           Sinister List organisation" - NME May 2000           +-+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+